David Plowman and Phil Hancock .2007. “Intellectual Capital and Financial Returns of Companies.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.8, No.1, PP.76-95.
Williams, S. Mitchell .2000. “Is a Company’s Intellectual Capital Performance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure Practices Related? Evidence from Publicly Listed Companies from the FTSE 100.” Working Paper Presented at McMasters Intellectual Capital Conference, Hamilton Ontario.
Kaplan, R.S; Norton D,P. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review ,January February,: 75-85.
Brem, A; Voigt, K. 2009. Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management-Insights from the German software industry, Technovation, Vol.
Storey, J; Emberson, C; Godsell, J; Harrison, A.2006. Supply chain management: theory, practice and future challenges, International journal of operation & production management, Vol.26, No.7:754-774.
Chataway, J; Tait, J; Wield, T. 2004. Understanding company R&D strategies in agro-biotechnology: trajectories and blind spots, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 6-7: 1041-1057.
Sharma, B.2003. R&D strategy and Australian manufacturing industry: an empirical investigation of emphasis and effectiveness, Technovation,Vol. 23, No. 12: 929-937.
Schmoch, U.2007. Double-boom cycles and the comeback of sciencepush and market-pull, Research Policy, Vol. 36, No. 7: 1000-1015.
Ishii, K; Ashihara, K. 2005. Application of quality function deployment for new business R&D strategy development, Stanford,IMEX.
Blalock, G; Gertler, P. J. 2009. How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology, Journal of Development Economics,Vol. 90, No. 2: 192-199.
Penan, H. 1996. R&D strategy in a techno-economic network: Alzheimer’s disease therapeutic strategies, Research Policy, Vol. 25, No.3: 337-358.
Bagheri, K.1381. R & D of Innovation Survey Necessity of Innovation Survey and Recovering the Designing and Engineering Activities in Iran, Second Symposium on Research Methods in Engineering Techniques and Science, Emam Hosein Universitty. (in Persian).
Halbrook, J.A.D.1997.The Use of National Systems of Innovation Models to Develop Indicators of Innovation and Technological Capacity. CPROST Report Simon Fraser University.
OECD.2002. Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Development, Paris.
OECD.2005. Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Third Edition, AA joint Publication of OECD and Euro stat.
Niosi, J.2002.National Systems of Innovation are “X-Efficient” (and X-Effective)- Why Some are Slow Learners Research Policy Journal, No 31, PP: 291-302.
Nasierowski,W;Arecelus,F.J.1999.Interrelationship among the Elements of National Innovation System: a Statistical Evaluation, European Journal of Operational Research, PP: 235-253.
Carksson, B;Jacobsson, S;Holmen, M; Rickne, A.2002. Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues, Research Policy, 31, PP: 233-245.
Godinho,M;Mendonca,S;Pereira,T.2003.Mapping Innovation System: A Framework Based on Innovation Data and Indicators, International Workshop on Empirical Studies on Innovation in Europe.
Porter,M.E;Stern,S;Furman, J.L.2002.The Determinants of National Innovation Capacity, Research Policy, 31, PP: 899-933.
Subject : The study on Relationship among intellection capital and innovation capital with financial performance and firm value of companies listed in Tehran stock Exchange.
Thesis Advisor(s): Sheila Mohave Ph. D & Rahmatola Mohamadipor Ph. D
Consulting Advisor: Farshad Sabzalipor
By: Ehsan Besharati
Abstract
In fact the traditional financial accounting is unable to evaluate the value of the companies, and just restricted to financial balance sheet and tangible properties.
The intellectual capital prepared a new complete model for evolution of the real value of the companies and institutions, and by using of this model we would be able to evaluate the future values of companies.
The main aim of this investigation is to evaluate the impel of intellectual capital and innovation capital on the financial performance and firm value of companies Listed in Tehran stock exchange.
In this study, the statically used method for analyzing the data, was the least aquaria method and the statistical sample of the study are include the existence accepted pharmaceutical companies and cement companies in Tehran stock exchange, and the time period of the study was from 1383 to 1388. the results of this investigation showed that there is no significant relationship between the intellectual capital and innovation capital, by respect to the value of the sample companies. While the relationship between the financial performance and intellectual capital is direct and significant, and the relationship between the financial performance and innovation capital is inverse and significant.
Key words: intellectual capital, innovation capital, financial performance, firm value, ROA, R&D
ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY
››M.A. ›› Thesis of : Accounting
Subject :
The study on Relationship among intellection capital and innovation capital with financial performance and firm value of companies listed in Tehran stock Exchange.
Thesis Advisor(s):
Consulting Advisor:
By:
2010-2011
1 -Chen et al
2 -Sullivan
3 -Intellectual Capital
4 -Innovation Capital
5 -Financial Performance
6 -Firm Value
1- intellectual capital
2- Hansen, G. S. and B. Wernerfelt
1- Intellectual Capital
2- Stewart
3- Salivan
4- Brooking
5- Bontis
1- Good will
2- King Hang Chan
1- Salivan
1- Bontis
2- Dierick & cool
3- Roos
4- Seetharaman
5- Stewart
6- Mouritsen
1- Edvinsson
2-Human capital
3- Structural capital
4- External capital
5- Goran Roos
6- Hannas & Lowendahl
7- Petty &Guthire
1- Dallimore & Lime
2-Scandia
1- ChenGo
2- Roos
1- Brooking
2- Sveiby
1- Stewart
1- Chengo
2- Petty
1- Chen et all
1- Petty & Goiter
1- Hannas & Lovendahel
1- Marr & Schiuma
2- Lim & Dalimor
1- Norton & Kaplan
2-Balanced scorecard by Kaplan and Norton
3- Internal Process
1- Apohami
1- Economic value-added
1- Balanced scorecard
2- Kaplan & Norton
3- Intangible asset control
1- Skandia Navigator
1- Zhao, H., Tong, X., Wong, P.K. & Zhu, J
1-Blalock, G. & Gertler, P.
2- Lukach, R., Kortand, P. M. & Plasmans, J
1- Penan, H
2- Brem, A. & Voigt, K
1- Ishii, K., Ashihara, K
1- Halbrook, J.A.D
2- Research & Development
3- Niosi, J
4- Innovation
5- Niosi, J
6- National Innovation Systems
7- Carksson, B. & Jacobsson, S. & Holmen M. & Rickne, A
1- Innovation Survey
2- Nasierwski & Arcelus
3- Carlsson & et al
4- Liue & White
5-Liue, X., White, S.,
1- Porter & et al
2- National Innovation Capacity
3-Porter, M.E., Stern, S., Furman, J.L
4- Godiho & et al
1- Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia
2- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
3- Oslo
1- Amara & Landry
2- System of Innovation
1- Fundamental Innovation
1-Performance
1-Hamilton
2-A. Marshal
3-P. Druker
4- Residual Income
5-Excess Earnings
6- Caning
7- Perinreich
8- Super – Profits
9- Edey
10- Excess Realizable Profit
11-Edwards & Bell
1- Key
2- Pensel
3- Abnormal Earnings
4- Feltham
5- Ohlson
1-Tobin
1- kujansivu p
2- Palic
1- Chen Goh
2 Appuhami
1- williams
1- Pew Tan
1- Economic Value Added
2- Market Value Added
3-Shareholder Value Added
1-Bontis
1- Pearson Correlation
—————
————————————————————
—————
————————————————————
‌ب

مطلب مرتبط :   منبع پایان نامه ارشد دربارهاستان هرمزگان، پژوهشگران

Written by 

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید