پایان نامه با واژه های کلیدی In، no، comment,، dimension

Table 4.10
inferential statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (1) Test Value = 0 t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
fac1
58.717
99
.000
33.79000
32.6481
34.9319 As the results in Table 4.10 show, there is a significant difference between mean of sample and that of population (sig=.000, df=99, mean difference=33). And because sample’s mean (33.79) exceeds population’s mean (22.5), it can be said that Iranian language teachers have a positive view toward the first dimension, it means that they believe that in language classes social and cultural issues must be attend to.
4.3.2. Language and ideology
This dimension consisted of 4 items:
10 .Decisions about educational system are made by executive directors in a top-down process.
11. Teacher must be aware of hidden curriculum and ideologies hidden in contents of educational course books.
12. Language may lead to a change in individuals᾽ culture and beliefs.
13. Education is a political action and may lead to violation of the rights of some particular group.
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (2) are shown in the Table 4.11 Table 4.11
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (2)
items
Strongly agree
agree
No comment
disagree
Strongly disagree
Q10
22.0 %
36.0 %
17.0 %
16.0 %
9.0 %
Q11
44.0 %
38.0 %
4.0 %
11.0 %
3.0 %
Q12
17.0 %
47.0 %
17.0 %
17.0%
2.0 %
Q13
17.0 %
20.0 %
33.0 %
20.0 %
17.0 % As the Table 4.11 indicates, 36% of participants agreed that decisions about educational system are made by executive directors in a top-down process, 22% strongly agreed, 17% had no comment, 16% disagreed, and 9% strongly disagreed. In item 11, 44% of participants strongly agreed that teacher must be aware of hidden curriculum and ideologies hidden in contents of educational course books, 38% agreed, 4% had no comment, 11% disagreed, and 3% strongly disagreed. In item12, 47% of participants agreed that language may lead to a change in individuals᾽ culture and beliefs, each of those teachers who strongly agreed, had no comment, and disagreed comprise 17% of participants, and just 2% strongly disagreed. In item 13, 33% of participants had no comment about the idea that education is a political action and may lead to violation of the rights of some particular group, 20% agreed, 10% strongly agreed, 20% again disagreed, and 17% strongly disagreed. In order to see whether there is a significant difference between the means of sample and population on the second dimension of critical pedagogy, a one sample t-test was run and the results are shown in the following table.
Table 4.12
Inferential statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (2) Test Value = 0 t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
fac2
48.710
99
.000
14.01000
13.4393
14.5807 As the results in Table 4.12 show, there is a significant difference between mean of sample and that of population in this dimension (sig=000, df=99, mean difference=14). And mean of sample exceeds mean of population, therefore it can be said that Iranian language teachers are aware of relationship between language and ideology. 4.3.3 Ethical issues and educational justice
This dimension consisted of 4 items:
14. Teaching method in the classroom may lead to creation and reinforcement of social inequalities.
15. Gender differences may causes differences in language learners’ way of learning.
16. Considering gender differences in language teaching is an essential issue.
17. There should be relation between students᾽ abilities and learning styles and teacher’s teaching methods and techniques.
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (3) are shown in the Table 4.13
Table 4.13
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (3)
items
Strongly agree
agree
No comment
disagree
Strongly disagree
Q14
21.0%
40.0%
24.0%
13.0%
2.0%
Q15
10.0%
39.0%
19.0%
20.0%
12.0%
Q16
11.0%
35.0%
24.0
23.0%
7.0%
Q17
33.0%
56.0%
6.0%
3.0%
2.0% As the Table 4.13 shows, 40% of participants agreed that teaching method in the classroom may lead to creation and reinforcement of social inequalities, 21% strongly agreed, 24% had no comment, 13% disagreed, and 2% strongly disagreed. In item 15, 39% of teachers agreed that gender differences may causes differences in language learners’ way of learning, 10% strongly agreed, 19% had no comment, 20% disagreed, and 12% strongly disagreed. In item 16, 35% of participants agreed that considering gender differences in language teaching is an essential issue, while 11% strongly agreed, 24% had no comment, 23% disagreed, and 7% strongly disagreed. In item 17, 56% of teachers agreed that there should be relation between students᾽ abilities and learning styles and teacher’s teaching methods and techniques, 33% strongly agreed, 6% had no comment, 3% disagreed, and 2% strongly disagreed. In order to see whether there is a significant difference between the means of sample and population on the third dimension of critical pedagogy, a one sample t-test was run and the results are shown in the following table. Table 4.14
Inferential statistics for dimension 3 Test Value = 0 t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
fac3
53.647
99
.000
14.15000
13.6266
14.6734 As the results in Table 4.14 indicates, there is a significant difference between mea n of sample and that of population (sig=.000, df=99, mean difference=14). And because sample’s mean (14.1) exceeds population’s mean (10), so it can be said Iranian language teachers are aware of ethical issues and educational justice in teaching. 4.3.4 Students᾽ needs and differences
This dimension consisted of 4 items:
18. Course book contents must be based on the analysis of students needs.
19. Teachers teaching method must be compatible with students᾽ interests.
20. Learning attitudes and styles of male and female students are different.
21. If students are not satisfied with contents and way of teaching, teacher must revise them.
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (4) are shown in the Table 4.15.
Table 4.15
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (4)
items
Strongly agree
agree
No comment
disagree
Stronglydisagree
Q18
40.0%
45.0%
8.0%
5.0%
2.0%
Q19
35.0%
48.0%
3%
10.0%
4.0%
Q20
15.0%
51.0%
20.0%
11.0%
3.0%
Q21
32.0%
49.0%
1%
13.0%
5.0% Results for item 18 indicates that 45% of participants agreed that course book contents must be based on the analysis of students needs, 40% strongly agreed, 8% had no comment, 5% disagreed, and just 2% strongly disagreed. In item 19, 48% agreed that teachers teaching method must be compatible with students᾽ interests, 35% strongly agreed with this item, 3% had no comment, 10% disagreed, and 4% strongly disagreed that students’ interests must be taken into account in teaching methods. In item20, 51% of respondents agreed that learning attitudes and styles of male and female students are different, 15% agreed, 20% had no comment, 11% disagreed, and just 3% strongly disagreed that male and female students have different attitudes and styles of learning. In item 21, 49% of participants agreed that if students are not satisfied with contents and way of teaching, teacher must revise them, while 32% strongly agreed with this view, just 1% had no comment, 13% disagreed, and 5% strongly disagreed. In order to see whether there is a significant difference between the means of sample and population on the fourth dimension of critical pedagogy, a one sample t-test was run and the results are shown in the following table. Table 4.16
Inferential statistics for dimension (4) Test Value = 0 t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
fac4
50.287
99
.000
15.70000
15.0805
16.3195
As the results in Table 4.16 indicates, there is a significant difference between mean of population and that of sample (sig=.000, df=99, mean difference=15). And because mean of sample exceeds mean of population, so it can be said that Iranian language teachers believe that students’ needs and differences must be attended to in language teaching
4.3.5 Students’ comments
This dimension consists of 3 items:
22. The only person who must think about students is the teacher, and students do not have qualification and ability to think about their affairs.
23. Only the teacher must speak in the class and students must only listen.
24. It is not necessary for the students to play a role in determining educational materials and resources.
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (5) are shown in the Table 4.17.
Table 4.17
Descriptive statistics for participants’ responses to dimension (5)
items
Strongly agree
agree
No comment
disagree
Strongly disagree
Q22
0%
2%
2%
27%
69%
Q23
0%
1%
2%
24%
73%
Q24
3%
12%
10%
40%
35% Participants᾽ responses to item 22 (Table 4.17) indicates that 69% of respondents strongly disagreed that the only person who must think about students is the teacher, and students do not have qualification and ability to think about their affairs, 27% disagreed, 2% had no comment, and 2% agreed with this view towards students. In item 23, 73% of participants strongly disagreed with this view that only the teacher must speak in the class and students must only listen, 24% disagreed, 2% had no comment, and 1% agreed. In item 24, 40% of respondents disagreed with this view that it is not necessary for the students to play a role in determining educational materials and resources, 35% strongly disagreed, 10% had no comment, 12% agreed, and 3% strongly disagreed. In order to see whether there is a significant difference between the means of sample and population on the]]>

پاسخی بگذارید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *